I read this article in The New York Times and I was intrigued by this notion that the defense made a comment that it was “comparable to her changing into gym clothes” (The New York Times). I was astonished to have had read this that the defense was able to turn the accusation around like it was a playful matter and make the victim feelings seem worthless. By doing this she is becoming more oppressed and the act itself is dehumanizing. “Dehumanization, which marks not only those whose humanity has been stolen, but also (though in a different way) those who have stolen it” (Paulo Freire). At the innocent age of 13 a transition period from childhood to puberty can be the most fragile years for a young lady to go through. Because of that the case was gendered bias that the defense mostly male they don’t understand the pain she endured. At the end she regains back her self worth/power of what was stripped away from her on that horrible day at school.
As for the school system should be allowed to execute this type of behavior no. While strip searches were implemented to keep the schools safe, there was a boundary that they crossed and after this example should eliminate strip searches in school unless the district is looking for a lawsuit that is bound to happen. Some school districts don’t feel that way because they believe that the law is behind them and it makes there actions justifiable. Schools function part as an “Ideological State Apparatus and function massively and predominantly by ideology, but they also function secondarily by repression, even if ultimately, but only ultimately, this is very attenuated and concealed, even symbolic” (Louis Althusser).
Althusser, Louis. “On the Reproduction of the Conditions of Production.” Lenin and Philosophy
Liptak, Adam. "Supreme Court Says Child's Rights Violated by Strip Search." The New York